Q-VALISLearning and Resourcesfor Regulated Industries
EU GMP - GOOD DOCUMENTATION PRACTICE & DATA INTEGRITYMODULE 05
PUBLIC PREVIEWOne selected course screen
© IC GLOBALTEST OOD · Protected learning content

MODULE 05 · 02

How to correct a handwritten entry

The practical method must make every required part of the correction visible

REGULATORY THEORYEU GMP Chapter 4, Annex 11 and PIC/S PI 041-1 · Chapter 4 · Section 4.9 · Annex 11 · Section 9 · PIC/S PI 041-1 Section 8.7

One visible correction — not a hidden replacement

EU GMP defines the result that every correction must achieve. PIC/S inspector guidance describes the familiar practical method for paper records, while Annex 11 requires the history of GMP-relevant electronic changes and deletions to be preserved through an audit trail based on risk.

Read the complete official provision ↗

Our interpretation — Paper and electronic corrections

On paper, the usual controlled method is simple: draw one line through the incorrect information so it remains readable; write the correct information nearby; add the identity or initials of the person making the correction; and add the actual date of the correction.

The single-line method is not a decorative convention. It is a practical way to comply with the EU GMP requirement that the original information remain readable. The exact position of the initials, date and reason may depend on the approved form and the organisation's SOP, but their meaning must be clear.

PAPER CORRECTION EXAMPLEThe original entry remains readable
Fictional laboratory worksheet showing the number 102.4 crossed out once, corrected to 120.4, dated and signed by Diana Smith, Chemist
The correction is added to the ordinary result field. The original value, corrected value, actual correction date and responsible person remain visible as one traceable history.

The person should correct only the information that is wrong. A whole page should not be cancelled merely to conceal one incorrect value. If the layout makes a normal correction genuinely impossible, the organisation must use a controlled exceptional process that preserves the original page and the justification for any replacement.

A second person does not automatically need to countersign every routine correction. Additional verification may, however, be required by the SOP or by the risk and significance of the corrected information.

In an electronic system, the correction must be made through an authorised function that preserves the original value and records the corrected value, the responsible user, the date and time of the change and, where required, the reason for it. This system-generated history is known as the audit trail. Audit trails and the review of audit trails are examined in detail in Modules 7 and 8.

PAPER EXAMPLEThe balance identification was entered incorrectly

An analyst writes Balance B-014 in a worksheet and immediately realises that Balance B-041 was used.

  • B-014 is crossed out with one line and remains readable
  • B-041 is entered beside it
  • The analyst adds attributable initials and the current date
  • The correction follows the approved SOP and does not disturb the rest of the record

The record now shows both the original mistake and its transparent correction. Nothing has been erased and the reviewer can reconstruct what occurred.

Required matching activityDrag from left to right, or select one item in each column
Controlled itemFunction in the evidence system